Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKollmar, Christy L.
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of Law
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-27T13:09:41Z
dc.date.available2018-06-27T13:09:41Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/38416
dc.description.abstractThis article makes the case that proper protection of Defendants’ fundamental rights, through the enhancement of procedural predictability and increased evidentiary transparency, will lead to more efficient, efficacious and sustainable leniency programmes equating to more fear of violative behaviour detection, an increased acknowledgment of anti-competitive participation, and enhanced overall cartel destabilisation for more balanced competition in the marketplace. With the clear link that exists between the severity of sanctioning, the exploitation of the leniency programme, and the protection of fundamental rights, it becomes imperative that a Defendant’s fundamental rights are not undermined so a later finding of cartel infringement can remain viable under heightened judicial scrutiny. The article provides final recommendations on how to strengthen leniency programmes by and through safeguarding a Defendant’s fundamental rights related to search warrant procurement and execution. The final recommendations provide insight on: Subject Matter and Purpose of the Investigation Burden / Threshold of Proof Procedure on Warrant Execution Obtainment of ‘Follow-on’ Evidenceen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRGSL Research Papers;20
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::Competition lawen_US
dc.titleA blind casting into the evidential sea: the interplay between fundamental rights and the efficacy of leniency programmesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record