Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaplane, Anastasija
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-16T08:20:04Z
dc.date.available2020-09-16T08:20:04Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/52503
dc.description.abstractThe end of the twentieth century was characterised by a series of state dissolution cases, such as the breakup of Czechoslovakia, the Socialist Federalist Republic of Yugoslavia, and the Soviet Union. In that context, the rules on state succession regained relevance, with the issue of state succession in respect of international responsibility becoming central. The topic first attracted the attention of the academic community and subsequently was chosen by the International Law Commission for study and codification. The present article examines the historical evolution of the rules on the succession of states, providing a review of case law where the Court referred to the concept of state succession to international responsibility, expressly or by implication. The author analyses the wording of the proposed Draft Articles and attempts to establish whether and how the principles of automatic succession and non-succession apply in different circumstances based on the newly developed provisions. The purpose of the study is to identify the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed Draft Articles as well as to discuss whether there is a need for codification of such rules.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRGSL Research Papers;23
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectState successionen_US
dc.subjectState responsibilityen_US
dc.subjectInternational Law Commissionen_US
dc.titleSuccession of states in respect of state responsibility: towards yet another Vienna Conventionen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record