Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHout, Tjaco T. van denEN
dc.contributor.authorKalniņš-Liberis, Kristofers
dc.contributor.otherRiga Graduate School of LawEN
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-01T11:17:07Z
dc.date.available2023-09-01T11:17:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/62041
dc.description.abstractNo universal legal norms for admitting unlawfully obtained evidence exist, but clearer guidelines in the question are needed. Legal principles like good faith and fair trial are important, and a balance must exist between the illegal act and the party using the evidence in court. Evidence obtained illegally is not automatically inadmissible, and legal and policy elements can guide tribunals in determining its admissibility. International dispute resolution mechanisms generally allow admitting all evidence, including hacked evidence. Judges and prosecutors must adhere to four principles: establish facts, deter unlawful conduct, respect individual rights, and maintain public confidence.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRiga Graduate School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCE::Other law::International lawen_US
dc.subjectevidenceen_US
dc.subjectinternational dispute resolutionen_US
dc.titleAdmissibility of unlawfully obtained evidence: legal implications for international dispute resolutionen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record