dc.contributor.author | Laidroo, Laivi | |
dc.contributor.author | Koroleva, Ekaterina | |
dc.contributor.author | Kliber, Agata | |
dc.contributor.author | Rupeika-Apoga, Ramona | |
dc.contributor.author | Grigaliuniene, Zana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-17T08:28:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-17T08:28:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Laidroo, L.; Koroleva, E.; Kliber, A.; Rupeika-Apoga, R.; Grigaliuniene, Z. Business Models of FinTechs – Difference in Similarity? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2021, 46, 101034, doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101034. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1567-4223 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1567422321000065 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/56724 | |
dc.description.abstract | The FinTech industry is gradually maturing and offers a wide range of financial services on the global stage. Still,
the understanding of FinTech business models remains at its infancy with a shortage of cross-country comparisons.
This paper aims to determine the differences in business model attributes of FinTechs in five rapidly
emerging FinTech hotspots in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Survey results from Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania,
Poland, and Russia, accompanied by cluster analysis, enable us to provide unique in-depth evidence on FinTech
business models. Across the selected countries, we observe significant differences in the attributes of FinTech
business models: key activities, key resources, value propositions, customer segments, delivery channels, cost
structure, and revenue stream. We identify four clusters of FinTechs: “lending community”, “mixed services”,
“payment service”, and “payment community”. Although these clusters share similarities with FinTech archetypes
proposed in previous research, they remain rather unevenly distributed across countries. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was supported by the Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia, under grants B57 ‘Efficiency in Financial Sector in Light of Changing Regulatory Environment’ and BHV1 ‘Digital Development in Finance’, as well as the project grant lzp-2020/2-0061 from the Latvian Council of Science. We acknowledge also the support of National Science Poland through the project MINIATURA 2019/03/X/HS4/01025 (covering the cost of running the Polish survey) as well as Regional
Initiative for Excellence programme of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of Poland, years 2019–2022, grant no. 004/RID/2018/19, financing 3,000,000 PLN (further research steps). The funding providers had no role in the research process from study design to submission. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier B.V. | en_US |
dc.relation | eu-repo/grantAgreement/FLPP/lzp-2020/2-0061//Mazo un vidējo uzņēmumu (MVU) digitālā transformācija un ilgtspēja Latvijas ekonomikas restartēšanai un modernizācijai/DigiSMEs/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Electronic Commerce Research and Applications;46 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Research Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Business and economics::Business studies | en_US |
dc.subject | FinTech | en_US |
dc.subject | Business models | en_US |
dc.subject | Business model attributes | en_US |
dc.subject | Business model canvas | en_US |
dc.subject | FinTech ecosystem | en_US |
dc.title | Business models of FinTechs – Difference in similarity? | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101034 | |